wshaffer (wshaffer) wrote,
wshaffer
wshaffer

  • Mood:

Politics: Money Talks

KQED's California Report has been doing some good reporting on some of the disturbingly skewed campaign spending going on in California elections.

For a start, there's Meg Whitman, who in her campaign for California governor has already spent $129 for every $1 Democrat Jerry Brown has spent, and we haven't even had the primary yet. Of course, this will all be deeply hilarious if after spending a metric ton of her own money, she loses the race, but I find myself not entirely sure of that outcome.

More sickening is PG&E's attempt to buy protection for its electric power monopoly by passing Proposition 16, which would require the approval of 2/3 of the voters before local governments could invest public money in electric power provision. PG&E has pledged to spend $30 million in campaigning for this. The Utility Reform Network, the major organization opposing Prop 16, has apparently spent $35,000. Because that's all they've got.

Again, I rather hope that voters will see Prop 16 for the transparent ploy it is and reject it. (PG&E has done their best to spin it as giving voters the power to stop local governments from wasting money on expensive boondoggles, but I imagine that many voters will see the "Paid for by Pacific Gas and Electric" all over the ads, and draw their own conclusions.) But that will still leave us with a situation where PG&E will have spent $30 million, paid for by the utility bills of customers like me*, to try to preserve their ability to gouge enough money out of customers like me to continue to fund political campaigns. I am not amused.

* At the moment, I actually get my electricity from Silicon Valley Power, one of those public utilities that PG&E is trying to block with this measure. I get my gas from PG&E, though, and when we move to the new house, I might have to go back to PG&E for electricity as well.

So, clearly we need some kind of campaign finance reform. Or maybe a reform of California's initiative system so that fewer stupid special-interest propositions get on the ballot. However, until then, I'm doing the only useful things I can think of to do: I've made a couple of small donations to Jerry Brown's campaign and the No on 16 campaign. And I would encourage you, if you're a California voter, to do likewise and spread the word. Let's not let them buy our state without a fight.
Tags: politics
Subscribe

  • Well, this is going to be interesting

    Alert readers may have noticed that I haven't been posting much about Doctor Who lately. This is partly because I'm still working my way through…

  • Doctor Who: Robot of Sherwood

    Well, the early buzz on "Robot of Sherwood" had given me low expectations, so when I actually got around to watching it, I actually found it…

  • New Doctor Who!

    Dat title sequence. Damn. That is a thing of beauty. In terms of the episode itself, I think it mostly does what a regeneration episode needs to…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 0 comments